AMO Reviewing procedures

Something that’s been bothering me for a while now, is that there is no policy (that I know of) with regards to javascript errors caused by extensions. A lot of authors (even those writing well-known and much-used extensions) are sloppy about them. People worry about this.

What do you do about errors? What do you do about strict errors? Should we have the reviewers do a code review? Just double-check the js console? I feel there should be public questioning of this, because they at the very least indicate that the authors are not as careful about their code as Mozilla reviewers (and their standard procedures) are. Whether we should care greatly about that is up for discussion, of course. :-)